Skip to main content

Compare Helical Piles to Concrete Footings

0:20
0:47
2K views

At 0:20 in

February 1, 2025

What happens here

A second comment, 'Concrete is better and cheaper,' is displayed. The video shows another helical pile installation in an open, grassy area, again using a CAT mini-excavator. The narrator explains that concrete footings rely on assumed soil bearing capacity, whereas helical piles are installed to a specific torque, guaranteeing their load-handling capability. He then breaks down the costs associated with traditional concrete footings (sonotube, concrete bags, base plate), showing that they quickly add up, often surpassing the cost mentioned in the comment and excluding labor or inspection wait times.

Goal: This step counters the argument that concrete footings are better and cheaper, by highlighting the technical advantages of helical piles and comparing cost components.

Tools and materials

  • CAT Mini-Excavator
  • Helical Piles

What they say

Hide

directly to bedrock in some cases when you use concrete footings especially for a deck you're working off of an assumed soil bearing capacity helical piles are installed to a certain torque so you know that they're going to handle the load properly now and forever sonat tube $20 five bags of concrete $30 base plate for a 6x6 post $25 you're already at $75 and that doesn't include any of the labor or waiting for the inspection time and you know what some people you're

Auto-generated from the video audio.