Skip to main content

Analyzing Track Assembly Design

2:25
4:42
296.5K views

At 2:25 in

Caterpillar Skid Loader Vs BobCat Skid Steer at the GIE-Expo

What happens here

This comprehensive step compares the track assembly designs of both loader types, focusing on functionality, self-cleaning capabilities, and obstacle navigation. The CAT 299D2 features an open track design that prevents mud and debris from packing in, allowing for easy self-cleaning—a crucial advantage in conditions like Florida's sandy, mucky soil or Minnesota's clay. This design minimizes wear on the track's teeth and sprocket. In contrast, the Bobcat T770's enclosed track assembly has no clearance, leading to dirt and mud accumulating and hardening, making it extremely difficult to clean, even with a pressure washer, and causing accelerated wear. The video also highlights CAT's 'Multi-Terrain Track' option, which is a heavy-duty, one-piece construction with spring-loaded rollers designed to 'snake over' obstacles like curbs or logs, reducing impact and wear, especially beneficial for landscaping work. Bobcat's track tensioning involves a grease fitting to tighten a piston, which is a different approach.

Goal: Compare track assembly designs for self-cleaning, durability, and obstacle navigation.

Tools and materials

  • Bobcat T770 Tracked Loader Bobcat — Illustrating enclosed track design issues and track tensioning method
  • CAT 299D2 Track Skid Steer Loader CAT — Showcasing open, self-cleaning, and multi-terrain track features
  • Flat-Nosed Shovel N/A — Suggested for cleaning Bobcat's packed tracks
  • Grease Fitting N/A — Used for tensioning tracks on Bobcat machines
  • Pressure Washer N/A — Mentioned as ineffective for cleaning Bobcat's enclosed tracks